SRHM in the news: Domestic political alliances with conservative forces in the US is costing women their health at home and abroad

18 November, 2019

 

THE BMJ OPINION

Domestic political alliances with conservative forces in the US is costing women their health at home and abroad

The Trump administration’s ideological commitment to the domestic anti-abortion lobby is endangering women across the Americas, say Hani Serag et al

 

SRHM article, Power and Politics in International Funding for Reproductive Health: the US Global Gag Rule by
Barbara B Crane & Jennifer Dusenberry was recently cited in the article below by the BMJ Opinion. The study showed that the Gag Rule has not achieved an overall reduction in abortions; rather, where it has disrupted family planning services, the policy is more likely to have increased the number of abortions.

Read the full article: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/08/19/domestic-political-alliances-with-conservative-forces-in-the-us-is-costing-women-their-health-at-home-and-abroad/

Read the full SRHM article:

Power and Politics in International Funding for Reproductive Healththe US Global Gag Rule
Since 2001, the US government has used its power as a leading donor to family planning programmes to pursue policies in conflict with global agreements on reproductive rights. Prominent among these policies is the Mexico City Policy (or Global Gag Rule), which restricts non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in developing countries that receive USAID family planning funding from engaging in most abortion-related activities, even with their own funds.

This paper reviews the history and political origins of the Gag Rule under several Republican party presidents. The Gag Rule has not achieved an overall reduction in abortions; rather, where it has disrupted family planning services, the policy is more likely to have increased the number of abortions. This paper concludes that the Gag Rule is a radical intrusion on the rights and autonomy of recipients of US funding.

Regardless of whether or not it is rescinded in future, the underlying issues in the politics of US reproductive health assistance are likely to persist. NGOs that wish to free themselves from the constraints it imposes must find the means to end their dependence on USAID funding, including turning to other donors. NGOs should also take the lead in opposing policies such as the Gag Rule that violate global agreements.

Join our mailing list

Receive the latest SRHM publications, call for papers and more.